FBS vs ScoreCM Comparison: Which Is Better for Traders?
We test brokers on real accounts using our own methodology, evaluating the quality of order execution, trading conditions, platforms and customer support.
Who is better - FBS or ScoreCM?
Our pick: FBS
Based on multiple factors - spreads and fees, available assets and instruments, execution quality, platform usability, support level, and educational resources - FBS looks preferable to ScoreCM.
FBS scored 4.3/5 and ranks 22 in our all Forex brokers list, whereas ScoreCM has 3.4/5 and ranks 61.
This is not financial advice. See the full comparison below.
Who is FBS suitable for?
FBS is suitable for beginners thanks to educational materials, as well as for experienced traders who value MetaTrader and reliability.
Who is ScoreCM suitable for?
ScoreCM is suitable for beginners and active scalpers with a modest deposit looking to trade on MT5 with high leverage, but not seeking a wide range of markets.
Comparison Table of FBS and ScoreCM
| Broker | FBS | ScoreCM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3/5 | 3.4/5 |
| Foundation Year | 2007 | 2024 |
| Regulated in Countries | Belize, Cyprus, Australia, South Africa | Dominica, Comoros |
| Minimum Deposit |
|
|
| Spread | from 0.7 points | from 0.1 points |
| Max Leverage | 1:3000 | 1:1000 |
| Trading Assets (CFDs) |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Review | FBS Review | ScoreCM Review |
FBS Review
FBS is a reliable choice for traders who value a secure and regulated trading environment, complemented by a robust selection of educational resources and trading tools. It is particularly well-suited for those new to trading or looking to expand their knowledge and experienced traders focusing on a diverse range of assets. Despite its limitations in account types and currency options, FBS's strengths in providing competitive trading conditions and comprehensive support make it a commendable broker for a broad spectrum of traders.
Pros and Cons of FBS
Pros
- Regulated by major international organizations.
- Low spreads and commissions.
- Wide range of trading assets.
- Extensive database of educational materials and analytical tools.
- Support for various trading platforms.
Cons
- Limited choice of trading accounts.
- Limited choice of account currency.
FBS is in the top 10 of the following ratings:
ScoreCM Review
ScoreCM is ideal for those looking to quickly start on MT5 with a small deposit and high leverage — suitable for beginners testing strategies and active scalpers. However, its offshore regulation and limited range of instruments make the platform less attractive for investors with substantial capital and those seeking broad diversification. Overall, the broker presents itself as a reliable entry-level 'workhorse' that requires cautious risk management.
Pros and Cons of ScoreCM
Pros
- Low entry threshold — Standard account opens with $10.
- High leverage up to 1:1000 (Forex) on the basic plan.
- Multiple commission-free deposit/withdrawal methods.
- Fast account opening: short form, auto-generated password, same-day verification.
- 24/5 multi-channel support.
Cons
- Offshore regulation and no compensation scheme.
- Short operating history (since 2024) and limited public reputation.
- Limited market offering — approximately 60 CFDs; no CFDs on stocks and soft commodities.
- High spreads/swaps on the Standard account and an annual $25 inactivity fee.
- Only one platform available (MT5).
Reliability
| Broker | FBS | ScoreCM |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 5/5 | 3.2/5 |
| Foundation Year | 2007 | 2024 |
| Regulated in Countries | Belize, Cyprus, Australia, South Africa | Dominica, Comoros |
| Regulators |
FBS
FBS is a reliable and regulated broker, overseen by several international bodies, ensuring client security and transparency.
ScoreCM
ScoreCM is regulated by offshore FSU authorities in Dominica and Mwali, publishes licensing information and claims segregation of client funds, but lacks compensation schemes and has a brief operational history.
Pros
- Two active licenses
- Segregation of client funds
Cons
- Low-tier offshore regulators
- No compensation fund
- Short operating history
Account Opening
| Broker | FBS | ScoreCM |
|---|---|---|
| Account Opening | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Minimum Deposit |
|
|
FBS
The account opening process at FBS is fast, clear, and relatively simple, although the verification procedure may take some time.
ScoreCM
The ScoreCM registration process is swift: a concise form, an email with a password, and a step-by-step KYC wizard. Account funding is possible within a few hours.
Pros
- 2–3 minutes to complete the form
- Intuitive KYC wizard
- Quick document approval
Cons
- Mandatory submission of 4 documents for KYC
- No social media registration
Account Types
| Broker | FBS | ScoreCM |
|---|---|---|
| Account Types | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Trading Accounts |
|
|
| Minimum Deposit |
|
|
| Spread | from 0.7 points | from 0.1 points |
| Max Leverage | 1:3000 | 1:1000 |
| Trading Assets (CFDs) |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Demo Account | ||
| Swap-free Account |
FBS
FBS offers only one trading account but with additional services.
Pros
- Availability of demo accounts for practice.
- The possibility of automated trading.
Cons
- Lack of investment accounts (PAMM, copy trading).
- Insufficient variety of trading accounts.
ScoreCM
Three account types cover basic needs, but there is a lack of variety: no cent, fixed-spread, ECN/STP, or Islamic accounts, and copy trading/PAMM services are absent.
Pros
- Deposit starting at $10
- Raw spreads on Pro/Elite accounts
Cons
- No cent or fixed-spread account
- No Islamic (swap-free) plan
- No copy trading/PAMM
Commissions
| Broker | FBS | ScoreCM |
|---|---|---|
| Commissions | 3.5/5 | 2.5/5 |
| Spread | from 0.7 points | from 0.1 points |
| Average Spread (EURUSD) | 0.9 | 1.8 |
| Commission per Lot | $3.5 |
FBS
FBS's commissions are average for the market.
Pros
- Low spreads.
Cons
- Possible withdrawal fees in the absence of trading activity.
ScoreCM
ScoreCM fees are moderate: $3.5 per lot on Pro/Elite accounts are competitive, but the Standard account, with a spread of 1.8 points and high swaps, is more expensive; the annual $25 inactivity fee slightly raises overall costs.
Pros
- No deposit/withdrawal fees
Cons
- High spreads and swaps on the Standard account
- $25/year account inactivity fee
- No discounts for high volume trading
Deposit and Withdrawal
| Broker | FBS | ScoreCM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Account Funding Methods |
|
|
FBS
FBS offers many deposit and withdrawal methods with high flexibility and accessibility.
ScoreCM
The absence of internal fees combined with a broad range of methods makes deposits and withdrawals convenient.
Pros
- No broker fees
- Minimum deposit of $10
- Instant deposit via e-wallet or cryptocurrency
Cons
- No option to deposit or withdraw via card
Markets and Products
| Broker | FBS | ScoreCM |
|---|---|---|
| Markets and Products | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| Forex | 43 | 42 |
| Precious Metals | 8 | 10 |
| Energy Carriers | 3 | 4 |
| Indices | 11 | 6 |
| Stocks | 480 | - |
| Cryptocurrency | 5 | 5 |
FBS
FBS provides a broad spectrum of trading assets, albeit with a limited selection of stocks and cryptocurrencies.
ScoreCM
ScoreCM offers roughly 60 CFDs, covering currencies, metals, oil/gas, indices, and a few cryptocurrencies. The absence of stocks and soft commodities renders the range noticeably poorer than that of most competitors.
Pros
- High leverage up to 1:1000
- CFDs available on cryptocurrencies
Cons
- Only about 60 instruments available
- No CFDs on stocks
- No soft commodities
Trading Platforms
| Broker | FBS | ScoreCM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
FBS
FBS has a wide choice of trading platforms, meeting the needs of different traders.
ScoreCM
The MT5 desktop, web, and mobile platforms cover most needs, but the absence of alternatives (MT4/cTrader/TradingView) and social features restrict flexibility.
Pros
- Comprehensive MT5 offering: desktop, web, and mobile applications
- Support for algo trading and the MQL5 marketplace
Cons
- No MT4, cTrader, or TradingView
- No copy trading or social signals
Analytics
| Broker | FBS | ScoreCM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 3/5 |
FBS
FBS offers extensive and high-quality analytical tools that contribute to effective trading.
ScoreCM
ScoreCM provides an economic calendar, a suite of calculators, a converter, and Autochartist — offering sufficient basic tools, though lacking proprietary reviews, webinars, and smart signals, resulting in only average analytics.
Pros
- Economic calendar
- Trading calculators
- Autochartist plugin
Cons
- Lacks daily market reviews and trade ideas
- No webinars/video analytics
Education
| Broker | FBS | ScoreCM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 3/5 |
FBS
FBS provides comprehensive educational materials suitable for traders at all levels.
ScoreCM
The text-based courses and extensive glossary provide a solid theoretical foundation, however without video content, webinars, and interactive elements, the ScoreCM educational package remains average for the market.
Pros
- Approximately 90 lessons across all levels
- Clear structure
- Extensive industry glossary
Cons
- No video lessons or webinars
- No interactive quizzes
- No live expert support
Customer Support
| Broker | FBS | ScoreCM |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Email Support |
|
|
| Hotline Phones |
|
|
| Social Media |
Messenger
Viber
Line
Telegram
Whatsapp
Facebook
Instagram
YouTube
Twitter
LinkedInFBS
The technical support of FBS operates 24/7, is multilingual, and offers prompt problem resolution.
ScoreCM
Multi-channel 24/5 support, approximately 30-minute response times, and withdrawal requests resolved within 2–4 hours — a high level of service from ScoreCM.
Pros
- Live chat, email, phone, WhatsApp, Telegram
- Average response time ≤ 30 minutes
- Quick issue resolution
Cons
- Peak times may see delays in chat responses
Comparisons of FBS and ScoreCM with other brokers
Conclusion
FBS stands out as the better overall pick, while ScoreCM trails on aggregate criteria.
FBS scored 4.3/5 and ranks 22 in our rating; ScoreCM has 3.4/5 and ranks 61.
We explain the reasons above in detail — fees, platforms, reliability, support, and more.
FAQ
Which broker is better: FBS or ScoreCM?
FBS comes out ahead by overall rank (score 4.3/5, position 22) versus ScoreCM (score 3.4/5, position 61).
Which broker is better for beginners: FBS or ScoreCM?
FBS is often a smoother start thanks to simpler onboarding and stronger baseline metrics. Still, your tools and budget should drive the final choice.
Who has lower typical trading costs (spreads/commissions) — FBS or ScoreCM?
It depends on the instrument and account type. Compare the live conditions in the “Commissions” section on this page — we break down the nuances category by category.
What trading platforms are available with FBS and ScoreCM?
FBS: MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, FBS Trader. ScoreCM: MetaTrader 5. See the “Platforms” section for details and selection tips.
What markets can you trade with FBS and ScoreCM?
FBS: Forex, Precious Metals, Energy Carriers, Indices, Stocks, Cryptocurrency. ScoreCM: Forex, Precious Metals, Energy Carriers, Indices, Cryptocurrency. Full lists and differences are in the “Markets” section.
What account types are offered by FBS and ScoreCM?
FBS: Standard. ScoreCM: Standard, Pro, Elite. See “Account Types” for a side-by-side comparison.
What deposit and withdrawal methods are supported by FBS and ScoreCM?
FBS: Neteller, Skrill, Perfect Money, SticPay, Visa, Mastercard, Maestro. ScoreCM: SticPay, Payment Asia, Swift, SEPA. Check method-specific fees/settlement times.
Which broker is safer — FBS or ScoreCM — and how was this assessed?
We consider regulation, corporate transparency, fund protection, and incident history. See the “Reliability” section for our findings.
