FP Markets vs Trading 212 Comparison: Which Is Better for Traders?
We test brokers on real accounts using our own methodology, evaluating the quality of order execution, trading conditions, platforms and customer support.
Who is better - FP Markets or Trading 212?
Our pick: FP Markets
Based on multiple factors - spreads and fees, available assets and instruments, execution quality, platform usability, support level, and educational resources - FP Markets looks preferable to Trading 212.
FP Markets scored 4.7/5 and ranks 3 in our all Forex brokers list, whereas Trading 212 has 4.3/5 and ranks 31.
This is not financial advice. See the full comparison below.
Who is FP Markets suitable for?
FP Markets is optimal for scalpers and algorithmic traders with ECN spreads of 0 pips, active Forex traders, as well as investors interested in copy trading and DMA stocks.
Who is Trading 212 suitable for?
Trading 212 is suitable for beginners thanks to educational materials and a low minimum deposit, and for experienced traders looking for affordability and simplicity
Comparison Table of FP Markets and Trading 212
| Broker | FP Markets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7/5 | 4.3/5 |
| Foundation Year | 2005 | 2003 |
| Regulated in Countries | Australia, Cyprus, South Africa, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Seychelles | United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Australia, Germany |
| Minimum Deposit |
|
|
| Spread | from 0 points | from 0 points |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:30 |
| Trading Assets (CFDs) |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Review | FP Markets Review | Trading 212 Review |
FP Markets Review

FP Markets successfully combines a strict licensing framework, a fast ECN order book with zero spreads, a rich selection of platforms — ranging from classic MT4/5 to TradingView and Iress DMA — and a developed analytics, education, and 24/7 support infrastructure. This combination makes the broker attractive for active scalpers and algorithmic traders who value speed and moderate commission per lot, as well as for investors preferring copy trading, PAMM/MAM, or DMA stocks via Iress. Beginners will benefit from a low entry of 100 AUD, online courses, and no inactivity fees.
Pros and Cons of FP Markets
Pros
- Robust regulation, serious fund protection plus segregated accounts in AA banks.
- Competitive trading conditions: spreads from 0 pip, commission 6 USD/lot; execution ≈ 20 ms on the NY4 server.
- Rich selection of trading platforms.
- Wide range of instruments.
- Numerous deposit/withdrawal methods.
- Strong analytics and education.
- 24/7 support.
Cons
- Lack of cent accounts and fixed spread accounts.
- Some analytical materials and software are accessible only with a deposit or trading volume.
FP Markets is in the top 10 of the following ratings:
Trading 212 Review

Trading 212 is a convenient and modern broker primarily aimed at retail investors and beginner traders. The platform combines ease of use, a low entry threshold, and zero commissions on stocks and ETFs, making it attractive for long-term investing and gradual portfolio building.
The broker is best suited for:
- beginner investors
- users with limited capital
- those who invest in stocks and ETFs
- traders who value a simple interface
Trading 212 is less suitable for active traders and professionals who need tight spreads, advanced platforms (MetaTrader, cTrader), and a wider selection of derivatives.
Pros and Cons of Trading 212
Pros
- Zero commissions on stocks and ETFs.
- Low minimum deposit.
- Convenient and easy-to-use platform.
- Fractional shares.
- No deposit and withdrawal fees.
- Regulation in leading financial jurisdictions.
Cons
- Wide spreads on CFDs.
- No MetaTrader or cTrader.
- Limited analytics.
- No live chat or phone support.
- Currency conversion fee.
Reliability
| Broker | FP Markets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Foundation Year | 2005 | 2003 |
| Regulated in Countries | Australia, Cyprus, South Africa, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Seychelles | United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Australia, Germany |
| Regulators |
FP Markets
Multi-tier licenses from ASIC, CySEC and FSCA, fund segregation, and a spotless regulatory history make FP Markets a reliable partner.
Pros
- Tier-1/Tier-2 licenses (ASIC, CySEC)
- Funds held in AA bank accounts, negative balance protection
- Independent order execution audits
Trading 212
Trading 212 demonstrates a high level of reliability thanks to regulation in the EU, Australia, and the UK, as well as participation in an investor compensation scheme.
Pros
- Regulated by FCA, ASIC, BaFin, CySEC
- Participation in the FSCS compensation scheme
- Transparent terms and oversight by regulators
Account Opening
| Broker | FP Markets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Account Opening | 5/5 | 4.8/5 |
| Minimum Deposit |
|
|
FP Markets
Opening an account completely online: registration in up to 5 minutes, verification within an hour, minimum deposit of 100 AUD — you can start trading on the same day.
Pros
- Fast registration and KYC
- Verification in less than one business day
- Commission-free deposit starting from 100 AUD
Trading 212
Opening an account with Trading 212 is a quick and simple process: registration is fully online, verification takes up to 1 day, and the low minimum deposit makes getting started highly accessible.
Pros
- Fully online registration
- Fast verification
- Low minimum deposit
Cons
- Mandatory KYC verification
- Verification delays are possible
Account Types
| Broker | FP Markets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Account Types | 4.3/5 | 4/5 |
| Trading Accounts |
|
|
| Minimum Deposit |
|
|
| Spread | from 0 points | from 0 points |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:30 |
| Trading Assets (CFDs) |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Demo Account | ||
| Swap-free Account |
FP Markets
The FP Markets account lineup is nearly universal — RAW, Standard, Islamic, Iress DMA, demo, and copy trading services meet the needs of most traders, all starting from 100 AUD.
Pros
- Accounts suitable for every trading style
- Free VPS and copy trading
Cons
- No cent/micro account
Trading 212
Trading 212 account types cover the main use cases—trading and investing. The lineup is simple and convenient, but it lags behind competitors in flexibility and lacks specialized accounts.
Pros
- CFD and Invest accounts are available
- Suitable for beginners and investors
- Demo account available
Cons
- Limited account variety
- ISA is available only in the UK
Commissions
| Broker | FP Markets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Commissions | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Spread | from 0 points | from 0 points |
| Average Spread (EURUSD) | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Commission per Lot | $3 |
FP Markets
Transparent pricing: an average ECN commission of $6 per lot, market spreads of ≈1.2 pips on the Standard account, free deposits, and no inactivity charges make the conditions attractive for most traders.
Pros
- No fees for deposits and withdrawals
- No account inactivity fees
Cons
- The Standard account does not offer ultra-narrow spreads
Trading 212
Trading 212's fees are below average thanks to zero commissions on Invest, but spreads and currency conversion reduce the overall attractiveness, especially for active CFD trading.
Pros
- Zero commissions on Invest/ISA
- No deposit/withdrawal fees
- Transparent fee structure
Cons
- CFD spreads are above average
- Currency conversion fee
Deposit and Withdrawal
| Broker | FP Markets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Account Funding Methods |
|
|
FP Markets
You can fund your account instantly and commission-free via any convenient method, and withdrawals are processed within one business day.
Pros
- 0% commission on all deposits
- Cards, e-wallets, crypto, local banks
- Withdrawals processed in less than one business day
Cons
- 0.5–1% commission on currency conversion
Trading 212
Deposits and withdrawals at Trading 212 are convenient and cost-effective: a wide range of methods with no fees and fast processing. A minor drawback is the lack of cryptocurrencies.
Pros
- No deposit/withdrawal fees
- Convenient methods (cards, PayPal, Apple Pay)
- Fast transactions
Cons
- No cryptocurrencies
- Bank transfers are slower
Markets and Products
| Broker | FP Markets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Markets and Products | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Forex | 81 | 35 |
| Precious Metals | 17 | 3 |
| Energy Carriers | 5 | 2 |
| Soft Commodities | 7 | 3 |
| Indices | 18 | 8 |
| Stocks | 566 | 51 |
| ETF | 58 | 5 |
| Bonds | 2 | - |
| Cryptocurrency | 12 | 22 |
FP Markets
The FP Markets range covers 700+ CFDs — from 80 currency pairs to DMA stocks on Iress, making portfolio diversification relatively straightforward.
Pros
- 80+ currency pairs, metals, indices, soft commodities
- 500+ CFDs on stocks from Europe, the UK, and the USA
- Leverage up to 1:500 for professional clients
Trading 212
Trading 212's markets and products cover key assets—stocks, ETFs, Forex, and CFDs. The offering is broad enough for most needs, but the lack of futures and options reduces versatility.
Pros
- Large selection of stocks and ETFs
- Access to international exchanges
- Suitable for investing and trading
Cons
- No futures or options
Trading Platforms
| Broker | FP Markets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
FP Markets
MT4/5, cTrader, TradingView, and Iress provide FP Markets with an almost complete arsenal: from algorithmic trading to DMA stocks. The versatility and fast NY4 connectivity put FP Markets’ platform suite among the best.
Pros
- 4 platforms, including TradingView and Iress DMA
- Execution ≈ 0.02 sec on NY4, supports bots and API
- Mobile and web versions of MT4/5 plus a proprietary application
Cons
- Iress is fee-based without turnover ≥150 AUD
- No browser-based cTrader Web
Trading 212
Trading 212's platforms are convenient and easy to understand, suitable for most users. The functionality is sufficient for trading, but the limited choice lowers the score.
Pros
- Simple and user-friendly interface
- Web and mobile versions available
- Suitable for beginners
Cons
- No MetaTrader/cTrader
- Limited features for professionals
Analytics
| Broker | FP Markets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 3.5/5 |
FP Markets
FP Markets offers a rich analytics suite — Trading Central, Autochartist, Traders Toolbox, TradeMedic, and a daily blog — which covers technical, fundamental, and behavioral analysis; access to some tools requires a deposit/trading volume.
Pros
- Trading Central and Autochartist with alerts
- 12-module Traders Toolbox + TradeMedic
- Economic calendar and daily trading ideas
Cons
- Paid access required for some analytics
Trading 212
Trading 212's analytics are suitable for self-directed analysis: there are charts and data. But the lack of news and signals makes this section limited.
Pros
- Convenient charts
- Fundamental data available
- Suitable for basic analysis
Cons
- No news feed
- No expert analysis
Education
| Broker | FP Markets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 3.7/5 |
FP Markets
FP Markets offers courses, webinars, podcasts, and e-books ranging from basic to advanced, making its educational resources nearly universal.
Pros
- Regular webinars + an extensive video library
- Online courses for traders of various levels
- Numerous e-books
Trading 212
Trading 212's education is at a good level: plenty of videos and basic materials. It suits beginners, but it lacks depth and advanced content.
Pros
- Many educational videos
- FAQ and articles available
- Active forum
Cons
- No webinars
- Few advanced materials
Customer Support
| Broker | FP Markets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Email Support |
|
|
| Hotline Phones |
| — |
| Social Media |
FP Markets
FP Markets’ customer support responds within seconds, operates 24/7, and usually resolves issues on the first contact.
Pros
- 24/7 support
- Multiple support channels
- High support rating
Trading 212
Trading 212 support works 24/7 and is generally effective, but the lack of live chat and a phone line reduces the speed of resolving urgent issues.
Pros
- 24/7 support
- High-quality answers
Cons
- No live chat
- No phone support
Comparisons of FP Markets and Trading 212 with other brokers
Conclusion
FP Markets stands out as the better overall pick, while Trading 212 trails on aggregate criteria.
FP Markets scored 4.7/5 and ranks 3 in our rating; Trading 212 has 4.3/5 and ranks 31.
We explain the reasons above in detail — fees, platforms, reliability, support, and more.
FAQ
Which broker is better: FP Markets or Trading 212?
FP Markets comes out ahead by overall rank (score 4.7/5, position 3) versus Trading 212 (score 4.3/5, position 31).
Which broker is better for beginners: FP Markets or Trading 212?
FP Markets is often a smoother start thanks to simpler onboarding and stronger baseline metrics. Still, your tools and budget should drive the final choice.
Who has lower typical trading costs (spreads/commissions) — FP Markets or Trading 212?
It depends on the instrument and account type. Compare the live conditions in the “Commissions” section on this page — we break down the nuances category by category.
What trading platforms are available with FP Markets and Trading 212?
FP Markets: MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradingView. Trading 212: Trading 212. See the “Platforms” section for details and selection tips.
What markets can you trade with FP Markets and Trading 212?
FP Markets: Forex, Precious Metals, Energy Carriers, Soft Commodities, Indices, Stocks, ETF, Bonds, Cryptocurrency. Trading 212: Forex, Precious Metals, Energy Carriers, Soft Commodities, Indices, Stocks, ETF, Cryptocurrency. Full lists and differences are in the “Markets” section.
What account types are offered by FP Markets and Trading 212?
FP Markets: Standard, Raw. Trading 212: INVEST, ISA, CFD. See “Account Types” for a side-by-side comparison.
What deposit and withdrawal methods are supported by FP Markets and Trading 212?
FP Markets: Neteller, Skrill, SticPay, FasaPay, Virtual Pay, Pagsmile, Dragonpay, Swift, Rapid Transfer, Visa, Mastercard, Asia Banks, Rapyd. Trading 212: Apple Pay, Google Pay, PayPal, Bank Transfer, Credit and Debit Cards, Giropay, Dotpay, iDeal. Check method-specific fees/settlement times.
Which broker is safer — FP Markets or Trading 212 — and how was this assessed?
We consider regulation, corporate transparency, fund protection, and incident history. See the “Reliability” section for our findings.


