FBS vs Trading.com Comparison: Which Is Better for Traders?
We test brokers on real accounts using our own methodology, evaluating the quality of order execution, trading conditions, platforms and customer support.
Who is better - FBS or Trading.com?
Our pick: FBS
Based on multiple factors - spreads and fees, available assets and instruments, execution quality, platform usability, support level, and educational resources - FBS looks preferable to Trading.com.
FBS scored 4.3/5 and ranks 22 in our all Forex brokers list, whereas Trading.com has 4.1/5 and ranks 44.
This is not financial advice. See the full comparison below.
Who is FBS suitable for?
FBS is suitable for beginners thanks to educational materials, as well as for experienced traders who value MetaTrader and reliability.
Who is Trading.com suitable for?
Broker Trading.com suits traders looking for low commissions and a convenient platform. Beginner traders may lack analytics and educational materials.
Comparison Table of FBS and Trading.com
| Broker | FBS | Trading.com |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3/5 | 4.1/5 |
| Foundation Year | 2007 | 2017 |
| Regulated in Countries | Belize, Cyprus, Australia, South Africa | United Kingdom, United States |
| Minimum Deposit |
|
|
| Spread | from 0.7 points | from 0.6 points |
| Max Leverage | 1:3000 | 1:30 |
| Trading Assets (CFDs) |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Review | FBS Review | Trading.com Review |
FBS Review
FBS is a reliable choice for traders who value a secure and regulated trading environment, complemented by a robust selection of educational resources and trading tools. It is particularly well-suited for those new to trading or looking to expand their knowledge and experienced traders focusing on a diverse range of assets. Despite its limitations in account types and currency options, FBS's strengths in providing competitive trading conditions and comprehensive support make it a commendable broker for a broad spectrum of traders.
Pros and Cons of FBS
Pros
- Regulated by major international organizations.
- Low spreads and commissions.
- Wide range of trading assets.
- Extensive database of educational materials and analytical tools.
- Support for various trading platforms.
Cons
- Limited choice of trading accounts.
- Limited choice of account currency.
FBS is in the top 10 of the following ratings:
Trading.com Review
Trading.com is an attractive choice for traders due to its low commission policy, which makes trading more affordable. Using the MetaTrader 5 platform satisfies traders' needs for modern trading tools and functionality. Additionally, the broker supports various deposit and withdrawal methods without additional commissions, which is convenient for clients from different countries.
Trading.com is suitable for experienced traders who do not depend on the broker's training materials and analytics and who are looking for low-cost trading in a wide range of traditional financial instruments.
Pros and Cons of Trading.com
Pros
- Low trading fees.
- Multiple deposit and withdrawal methods.
- Quality technical support.
Cons
- Limited educational materials.
- Sparse analytics.
Reliability
| Broker | FBS | Trading.com |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Foundation Year | 2007 | 2017 |
| Regulated in Countries | Belize, Cyprus, Australia, South Africa | United Kingdom, United States |
| Regulators |
|
|
FBS
FBS is a reliable and regulated broker, overseen by several international bodies, ensuring client security and transparency.
Trading.com
Broker Trading.com is reliable, as it is regulated by strict authorities in the UK and the US, ensuring the security of client funds.
Account Opening
| Broker | FBS | Trading.com |
|---|---|---|
| Account Opening | 4.5/5 | 5/5 |
| Minimum Deposit |
|
|
FBS
The account opening process at FBS is fast, clear, and relatively simple, although the verification procedure may take some time.
Trading.com
Account opening at Trading.com is fast and convenient.
Account Types
| Broker | FBS | Trading.com |
|---|---|---|
| Account Types | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Trading Accounts |
|
|
| Minimum Deposit |
|
|
| Spread | from 0.7 points | from 0.6 points |
| Max Leverage | 1:3000 | 1:30 |
| Trading Assets (CFDs) |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Demo Account | ||
| Swap-free Account |
FBS
FBS offers only one trading account but with additional services.
Pros
- Availability of demo accounts for practice.
- The possibility of automated trading.
Cons
- Lack of investment accounts (PAMM, copy trading).
- Insufficient variety of trading accounts.
Trading.com
Trading.com offers several accounts that satisfy most traders.
Pros
- Variety of account types.
- Minimum deposit of $5.
- Protection against negative balance.
Cons
- Lack of ECN accounts.
- No fixed spread accounts.
- No accounts for passive investing.
Commissions
| Broker | FBS | Trading.com |
|---|---|---|
| Commissions | 3.5/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Spread | from 0.7 points | from 0.6 points |
| Average Spread (EURUSD) | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| Commission per Lot |
FBS
FBS's commissions are average for the market.
Pros
- Low spreads.
Cons
- Possible withdrawal fees in the absence of trading activity.
Trading.com
Trading.com offers low commissions.
Pros
- No commission on trades.
- Tight spreads.
- No swap fees for major currency pairs.
Cons
- Inactivity fee.
Deposit and Withdrawal
| Broker | FBS | Trading.com |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Account Funding Methods |
|
|
FBS
FBS offers many deposit and withdrawal methods with high flexibility and accessibility.
Trading.com
Trading.com offers convenient and cost-effective deposit and withdrawal methods.
Pros
- No fees for deposit and withdrawal.
- Fast processing of withdrawal requests.
- Multiple available methods.
Cons
- Lack of cryptocurrencies as a payment method.
Markets and Products
| Broker | FBS | Trading.com |
|---|---|---|
| Markets and Products | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Forex | 43 | 55 |
| Precious Metals | 8 | 2 |
| Energy Carriers | 3 | 5 |
| Indices | 11 | 14 |
| Stocks | 480 | 1261 |
| Cryptocurrency | 5 | - |
| Soft Commodities | - | 8 |
FBS
FBS provides a broad spectrum of trading assets, albeit with a limited selection of stocks and cryptocurrencies.
Trading.com
Trading.com offers a diverse range of markets and products.
Pros
- Wide selection of stocks and currency pairs.
- Access to various global markets.
Cons
- Lack of cryptocurrencies.
- Low leverage (max. 1:30).
Trading Platforms
| Broker | FBS | Trading.com |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
FBS
FBS has a wide choice of trading platforms, meeting the needs of different traders.
Trading.com
Trading.com utilizes the reliable MT5 platform.
Pros
- Integration with robots and advisors.
- One-click trading, without requotes.
- Wide range of assets and analytical tools.
Cons
- Limited choice of platforms (only MT5).
Analytics
| Broker | FBS | Trading.com |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 3/5 |
FBS
FBS offers extensive and high-quality analytical tools that contribute to effective trading.
Trading.com
The analytical material set on Trading.com is not impressive.
Pros
- A variety of instruments for American traders.
- Technical analysis and trading signals.
Cons
- Limited set of instruments for the UK.
- Lack of materials for beginners.
Education
| Broker | FBS | Trading.com |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 2/5 |
FBS
FBS provides comprehensive educational materials suitable for traders at all levels.
Trading.com
The educational materials on Trading.com are sparse and limited, especially for European clients.
Pros
- Availability of video tutorials.
- Guides for traders of different levels.
Cons
- No materials for European clients.
- Insufficient variety.
- Lack of webinars and podcasts.
Customer Support
| Broker | FBS | Trading.com |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 4.3/5 |
| Email Support |
|
|
| Hotline Phones |
|
|
| Social Media |
Messenger
Viber
Line
Telegram
Whatsapp
Facebook
Instagram
YouTube
LinkedIn
TwitterFBS
The technical support of FBS operates 24/7, is multilingual, and offers prompt problem resolution.
Trading.com
Trading.com's technical support operates 24/5 and offers multiple communication channels.
Pros
- Operates 24/5.
- Fast and competent responses.
- Multiple communication channels.
Cons
- Lack of messengers for quick communication.
Comparisons of FBS and Trading.com with other brokers
Conclusion
FBS stands out as the better overall pick, while Trading.com trails on aggregate criteria.
FBS scored 4.3/5 and ranks 22 in our rating; Trading.com has 4.1/5 and ranks 44.
We explain the reasons above in detail — fees, platforms, reliability, support, and more.
FAQ
Which broker is better: FBS or Trading.com?
FBS comes out ahead by overall rank (score 4.3/5, position 22) versus Trading.com (score 4.1/5, position 44).
Which broker is better for beginners: FBS or Trading.com?
FBS is often a smoother start thanks to simpler onboarding and stronger baseline metrics. Still, your tools and budget should drive the final choice.
Who has lower typical trading costs (spreads/commissions) — FBS or Trading.com?
It depends on the instrument and account type. Compare the live conditions in the “Commissions” section on this page — we break down the nuances category by category.
What trading platforms are available with FBS and Trading.com?
FBS: MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, FBS Trader. Trading.com: MetaTrader 5. See the “Platforms” section for details and selection tips.
What markets can you trade with FBS and Trading.com?
FBS: Forex, Precious Metals, Energy Carriers, Indices, Stocks, Cryptocurrency. Trading.com: Forex, Precious Metals, Energy Carriers, Soft Commodities, Indices, Stocks. Full lists and differences are in the “Markets” section.
What account types are offered by FBS and Trading.com?
FBS: Standard. Trading.com: Ultra-Low Standard, Ultra-Low Micro. See “Account Types” for a side-by-side comparison.
What deposit and withdrawal methods are supported by FBS and Trading.com?
FBS: Neteller, Skrill, Perfect Money, SticPay, Visa, Mastercard, Maestro. Trading.com: Neteller, Skrill, Bank Transfer, Credit and Debit Cards. Check method-specific fees/settlement times.
Which broker is safer — FBS or Trading.com — and how was this assessed?
We consider regulation, corporate transparency, fund protection, and incident history. See the “Reliability” section for our findings.
