FBS vs Trading 212 Comparison
Compare trading conditions, commissions and platforms of Forex brokers FBS and Trading 212. Find out which broker is best for you.
We test brokers on real accounts using our own methodology, evaluating the quality of order execution, trading conditions, platforms and customer support.
Who is better - FBS or Trading 212?
Our pick: FBS
Based on multiple factors - spreads and fees, available assets and instruments, execution quality, platform usability, support level, and educational resources - FBS looks preferable to Trading 212.
FBS scored 4.3/5 and ranks 25 in our all Forex brokers list, whereas Trading 212 has 4.3/5 and ranks 34.
This is not financial advice. See the full comparison below.
Who is FBS suitable for?
FBS is suitable for beginners thanks to educational materials, as well as for experienced traders who value MetaTrader and reliability.
Who is Trading 212 suitable for?
Trading 212 is suitable for beginners thanks to educational materials and a low minimum deposit, and for experienced traders looking for affordability and simplicity
Comparison Table of FBS and Trading 212
| Broker | FBS | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3/5 | 4.3/5 |
| Foundation Year | 2008 | 2004 |
| Regulated in Countries | Belize, Cyprus, Australia, South Africa | United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Australia, Germany |
| Minimum Deposit |
|
|
| Spread | from 0.7 points | from 0 points |
| Max Leverage | 1:3000 | 1:30 |
| Trading Assets (CFDs) |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Review | FBS Review | Trading 212 Review |
FBS Review

FBS is a reliable choice for traders who value a secure and regulated trading environment, complemented by a robust selection of educational resources and trading tools. It is particularly well-suited for those new to trading or looking to expand their knowledge and experienced traders focusing on a diverse range of assets. Despite its limitations in account types and currency options, FBS's strengths in providing competitive trading conditions and comprehensive support make it a commendable broker for a broad spectrum of traders.
Pros and Cons of FBS
Pros
- Regulated by major international organizations.
- Low spreads and commissions.
- Wide range of trading assets.
- Extensive database of educational materials and analytical tools.
- Support for various trading platforms.
Cons
- Limited choice of trading accounts.
- Limited choice of account currency.
FBS is in the top 10 of the following ratings:
Trading 212 Review

Trading 212 is a convenient and modern broker primarily aimed at retail investors and beginner traders. The platform combines ease of use, a low entry threshold, and zero commissions on stocks and ETFs, making it attractive for long-term investing and gradual portfolio building.
The broker is best suited for:
- beginner investors
- users with limited capital
- those who invest in stocks and ETFs
- traders who value a simple interface
Trading 212 is less suitable for active traders and professionals who need tight spreads, advanced platforms (MetaTrader, cTrader), and a wider selection of derivatives.
Pros and Cons of Trading 212
Pros
- Zero commissions on stocks and ETFs.
- Low minimum deposit.
- Convenient and easy-to-use platform.
- Fractional shares.
- No deposit and withdrawal fees.
- Regulation in leading financial jurisdictions.
Cons
- Wide spreads on CFDs.
- No MetaTrader or cTrader.
- Limited analytics.
- No live chat or phone support.
- Currency conversion fee.
Reliability
| Broker | FBS | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Foundation Year | 2008 | 2004 |
| Regulated in Countries | Belize, Cyprus, Australia, South Africa | United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Australia, Germany |
| Regulators |
FBS
FBS is a reliable and regulated broker, overseen by several international bodies, ensuring client security and transparency.
Trading 212
Trading 212 demonstrates a high level of reliability thanks to regulation in the EU, Australia, and the UK, as well as participation in an investor compensation scheme.
Pros
- Regulated by FCA, ASIC, BaFin, CySEC
- Participation in the FSCS compensation scheme
- Transparent terms and oversight by regulators
Account Opening
| Broker | FBS | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Account Opening | 4.5/5 | 4.8/5 |
| Minimum Deposit |
|
|
FBS
The account opening process at FBS is fast, clear, and relatively simple, although the verification procedure may take some time.
Trading 212
Opening an account with Trading 212 is a quick and simple process: registration is fully online, verification takes up to 1 day, and the low minimum deposit makes getting started highly accessible.
Pros
- Fully online registration
- Fast verification
- Low minimum deposit
Cons
- Mandatory KYC verification
- Verification delays are possible
Account Types
| Broker | FBS | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Account Types | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Trading Accounts |
|
|
| Minimum Deposit |
|
|
| Spread | from 0.7 points | from 0 points |
| Max Leverage | 1:3000 | 1:30 |
| Trading Assets (CFDs) |
|
|
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
| Demo Account | ||
| Swap-free Account |
FBS
FBS offers only one trading account but with additional services.
Pros
- Availability of demo accounts for practice.
- The possibility of automated trading.
Cons
- Lack of investment accounts (PAMM, copy trading).
- Insufficient variety of trading accounts.
Trading 212
Trading 212 account types cover the main use cases—trading and investing. The lineup is simple and convenient, but it lags behind competitors in flexibility and lacks specialized accounts.
Pros
- CFD and Invest accounts are available
- Suitable for beginners and investors
- Demo account available
Cons
- Limited account variety
- ISA is available only in the UK
Commissions
| Broker | FBS | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Commissions | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Spread | from 0.7 points | from 0 points |
| Average Spread (EURUSD) | 0.9 | 1.2 |
| Commission |
FBS
FBS's commissions are average for the market.
Pros
- Low spreads.
Cons
- Possible withdrawal fees in the absence of trading activity.
Trading 212
Trading 212's fees are below average thanks to zero commissions on Invest, but spreads and currency conversion reduce the overall attractiveness, especially for active CFD trading.
Pros
- Zero commissions on Invest/ISA
- No deposit/withdrawal fees
- Transparent fee structure
Cons
- CFD spreads are above average
- Currency conversion fee
Deposit and Withdrawal
| Broker | FBS | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Account Funding Methods |
|
|
FBS
FBS offers many deposit and withdrawal methods with high flexibility and accessibility.
Trading 212
Deposits and withdrawals at Trading 212 are convenient and cost-effective: a wide range of methods with no fees and fast processing. A minor drawback is the lack of cryptocurrencies.
Pros
- No deposit/withdrawal fees
- Convenient methods (cards, PayPal, Apple Pay)
- Fast transactions
Cons
- No cryptocurrencies
- Bank transfers are slower
Markets and Products
| Broker | FBS | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Markets and Products | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| Forex | 43 | 35 |
| Precious Metals | 8 | 3 |
| Energy Carriers | 3 | 2 |
| Indices | 11 | 8 |
| Stocks | 480 | 51 |
| Cryptocurrency | 5 | 22 |
| Soft Commodities | - | 3 |
| ETF | - | 5 |
FBS
FBS provides a broad spectrum of trading assets, albeit with a limited selection of stocks and cryptocurrencies.
Trading 212
Trading 212's markets and products cover key assets—stocks, ETFs, Forex, and CFDs. The offering is broad enough for most needs, but the lack of futures and options reduces versatility.
Pros
- Large selection of stocks and ETFs
- Access to international exchanges
- Suitable for investing and trading
Cons
- No futures or options
Trading Platforms
| Broker | FBS | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Trading Platforms |
|
|
FBS
FBS has a wide choice of trading platforms, meeting the needs of different traders.
Trading 212
Trading 212's platforms are convenient and easy to understand, suitable for most users. The functionality is sufficient for trading, but the limited choice lowers the score.
Pros
- Simple and user-friendly interface
- Web and mobile versions available
- Suitable for beginners
Cons
- No MetaTrader/cTrader
- Limited features for professionals
Analytics
| Broker | FBS | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 3.5/5 |
FBS
FBS offers extensive and high-quality analytical tools that contribute to effective trading.
Trading 212
Trading 212's analytics are suitable for self-directed analysis: there are charts and data. But the lack of news and signals makes this section limited.
Pros
- Convenient charts
- Fundamental data available
- Suitable for basic analysis
Cons
- No news feed
- No expert analysis
Education
| Broker | FBS | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 3.7/5 |
FBS
FBS provides comprehensive educational materials suitable for traders at all levels.
Trading 212
Trading 212's education is at a good level: plenty of videos and basic materials. It suits beginners, but it lacks depth and advanced content.
Pros
- Many educational videos
- FAQ and articles available
- Active forum
Cons
- No webinars
- Few advanced materials
Customer Support
| Broker | FBS | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Email Support |
|
|
| Hotline Phones |
| — |
| Social Media |
FBS
The technical support of FBS operates 24/7, is multilingual, and offers prompt problem resolution.
Trading 212
Trading 212 support works 24/7 and is generally effective, but the lack of live chat and a phone line reduces the speed of resolving urgent issues.
Pros
- 24/7 support
- High-quality answers
Cons
- No live chat
- No phone support
Comparisons of FBS and Trading 212 with other brokers
Conclusion
FBS stands out as the better overall pick, while Trading 212 trails on aggregate criteria.
FBS scored 4.3/5 and ranks 25 in our rating; Trading 212 has 4.3/5 and ranks 34.
We explain the reasons above in detail — fees, platforms, reliability, support, and more.
FAQ
Which broker is better: FBS or Trading 212?
FBS comes out ahead by overall rank (score 4.3/5, position 25) versus Trading 212 (score 4.3/5, position 34).
Which broker is better for beginners: FBS or Trading 212?
FBS is often a smoother start thanks to simpler onboarding and stronger baseline metrics. Still, your tools and budget should drive the final choice.
Who has lower typical trading costs (spreads/commissions) — FBS or Trading 212?
It depends on the instrument and account type. Compare the live conditions in the “Commissions” section on this page — we break down the nuances category by category.
What trading platforms are available with FBS and Trading 212?
FBS: MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, FBS Trader. Trading 212: Trading 212. See the “Platforms” section for details and selection tips.
What markets can you trade with FBS and Trading 212?
FBS: Forex, Precious Metals, Energy Carriers, Indices, Stocks, Cryptocurrency. Trading 212: Forex, Precious Metals, Energy Carriers, Soft Commodities, Indices, Stocks, ETF, Cryptocurrency. Full lists and differences are in the “Markets” section.
What account types are offered by FBS and Trading 212?
FBS: Standard. Trading 212: INVEST, ISA, CFD. See “Account Types” for a side-by-side comparison.
What deposit and withdrawal methods are supported by FBS and Trading 212?
FBS: Neteller, Skrill, SticPay, Visa, Mastercard, Maestro. Trading 212: Apple Pay, Google Pay, PayPal, Bank Transfer, Credit and Debit Cards, Giropay, Dotpay, iDeal. Check method-specific fees/settlement times.
Which broker is safer — FBS or Trading 212 — and how was this assessed?
We consider regulation, corporate transparency, fund protection, and incident history. See the “Reliability” section for our findings.
