Trading costs

Raw Spread vs Standard Account: Compare the Full Trading Cost

A smaller spread can come with a separate commission. Compare the same completed trade, find where the costs are equal, and see how bid and ask prices affect your result.

Author · Editor

Reviewed

Two glass trays: a single pale stone block on the left, a teal block and a separate brass block on the right.

The essentials

  1. Compare the spread and the commission for the same completed trade, in the same currency and at the same position size.

  2. A lower advertised spread does not guarantee a lower cost. Normalize per-side, per-lot and round-turn quotes before comparing them.

  3. With proportional fees, trading more often scales the difference; it does not by itself change which account is cheaper.

What is the difference between a Raw Spread and a Standard account?

For retail forex, a Standard account commonly includes the broker’s pricing charge in a wider spread, with no separate trading commission. A Raw Spread account commonly combines a narrower spread with a separate commission. Neither structure is always cheaper: compare their combined cost for the same trade.

What to compare

Typical Standard structure

Typical Raw Spread structure

Quoted spread

Includes a pricing markup

Usually narrower; can still vary

Separate forex commission

Often zero

Often charged on volume or turnover

Cost comparison

Spread cost plus any applicable commission

Spread cost plus normalized commission

What the name does not establish

Execution quality or the complete fee schedule

Guaranteed zero spreads, ECN routing or better execution

Scroll sideways to compare all columns ↔

These are common pricing patterns, not standardized account definitions. Pepperstone’s account pricing illustrates the distinction and also shows why instrument and platform exceptions matter. Read the conditions for the exact product, legal entity and platform you can use.

Here, a round trip means opening and fully closing one position of the same size. The comparison covers spread and trading commission. Overnight financing, execution differences and other applicable fees need their own checks.

Compare the cost of the same completed trade

Start with a hypothetical EUR/USD trade in a USD account. One standard lot is 100,000 EUR, so one pip, or 0.0001 USD per EUR, is worth $10. Standard has a 1.2-pip spread and no separate commission. Raw has a 0.2-pip spread and a $3.50 commission per lot, per side.

For one lot, Standard costs 1.2 × $10 = $12. Raw costs 0.2 × $10 + 2 × $3.50 = $9. The $3 difference is an estimate from these inputs, not a broker offer. Change the Standard spread to 0.8 pips and its $8 cost becomes lower than Raw’s $9.

The spread input represents the average of the full spread at entry and the full spread at exit. If both are the same, enter that spread once. The comparison keeps EUR/USD and USD fixed to make the arithmetic visible; use the Forex Spread Calculator for a broader calculation with your own instrument and account inputs.

Try it yourself

Per side, per lot or round turn: put commissions on the same basis

The word “commission” is not enough. A quote may cover one execution, both sides of a trade, or the entire selected position. First identify its currency, volume unit and whether it includes the opening and closing sides.

Illustrative quote

Normalization

Commission for a completed 0.20-lot trade

$3.50 per lot, per side

3.50 × 2 × 0.20

$1.40

$7 per lot, round turn

7 × 0.20

$1.40

$1.40 total for this trade, round turn

Already the total; do not multiply again

$1.40

Scroll sideways to compare all columns ↔

A tariff per 100,000 USD of turnover is different from a tariff per standard lot of the base currency. For example, 100,000 EUR has a USD value that depends on EUR/USD. IC Markets’ cost documentation distinguishes these conventions. Apply the actual tariff to the opening and closing amounts before comparing the result.

Convert spread cost and commission into one account currency using the applicable conversion convention. Check minimum commissions, rounding, rebates and volume tiers separately. A round-turn charge may be booked at opening or split between opening and closing; the timing of the debit does not change which sides the quoted amount covers.

At what spread do Raw and Standard cost the same?

Let V be the pip value per lot and L the number of lots. After converting each commission to the total for that completed trade, the costs are equal when: (Standard spread − Raw spread) × V × L = Raw commission − Standard commission.

In the one-lot example, the extra Raw commission is $7 and the pip value is $10. Raw therefore needs a spread advantage of 7 ÷ 10 = 0.7 pip to offset that commission. With Standard at 1.2 pips, a Raw spread of 0.5 pips produces the same $12 cost. Below 0.5, Raw is cheaper in this model; above 0.5, Standard is cheaper.

You can read the same comparison in equivalent pips. Raw’s 0.2-pip spread plus $7 ÷ $10 of commission equals 0.9 pip. Standard at 0.9 pip ties it; Standard at 0.8 pip is cheaper. This equal-cost point compares charges. It is not the price move needed to make a particular trading strategy profitable.

Why a round trip does not mean paying two full spreads

A long position buys at ask and sells at bid; a short sells at bid and buys back at ask. Relative to the midpoint between bid and ask, each execution crosses half of that moment’s full spread. The combined spread effect is therefore half the entry spread plus half the exit spread.

This separate example keeps the midpoint at 1.10000 and uses one lot, with no commission or slippage. Switch between long and short, then widen the exit spread. The quote cards show exactly which price is used on each side. Changes in the comparison above do not alter this fixed teaching example.

Try it yourself

Follow the prices through to P&L

With a 1.2-pip spread around 1.10000, bid is 1.09994 and ask is 1.10006. A long opened at 1.10006 and closed at 1.09994 loses 0.00012 × 100,000 = $12 before commission. It does not lose $24. A short opened at bid and closed at ask has the same $12 loss while these quotes remain unchanged.

If the entry spread is 1.2 pips and the exit spread widens to 3.2 pips around the same midpoint, the spread effect is (1.2 + 3.2) ÷ 2 = 2.2 pips, or $22 for one lot. This midpoint comparison isolates the spread effect; a real position’s P&L also reflects the movement in price and its actual executions.

P&L calculated from actual opening and closing fill prices already contains their spread effect. Do not subtract an estimated spread again. Reconcile separately booked commissions and financing with the statement, and check whether the displayed result already includes them. Slippage describes a difference between a reference price and the actual fill; it also needs a clearly stated reference to avoid double-counting.

Do larger lots or more trades make Raw cheaper?

Not by themselves. With the original proportional rates, a 0.10-lot trade costs $1.20 on Standard and $0.90 on Raw. Ten identical completed trades cost $12 and $9 respectively. Multiplying trade size or trade count scales the difference without reversing it, as long as the spreads, pip value and fee rules stay the same.

Minimum charges can change that relationship. Suppose, purely for illustration, Raw has a minimum commission of $1 for the whole completed trade. At 0.01 lot, its spread cost is $0.02 and its commission is $1, for a $1.02 total; Standard costs $0.12. At one lot, the $7 proportional commission exceeds the minimum, so the original $9 versus $12 comparison returns.

The teaching comparison does not apply a minimum charge. Actual minimums may be per order or per side rather than per completed position, and partial fills or multiple closes can affect their application. IBKR’s spot-currency schedule is an example of why the unit attached to a minimum matters, not a tariff to substitute into a retail CFD account. Tiered rates, rebates and changing execution conditions can also break a simple proportional comparison.

Use comparable inputs before choosing an account

An advertised spread “from 0.0” is a possible minimum, not the spread you will obtain on every trade. Do not compare one account’s minimum with another account’s average. Use the same instrument, session and observation period, and look at conditions around the times you actually trade.

  • Match the symbol and contract size. EUR/USD, a gold CFD and a stock CFD do not share one universal pip value or commission rule.
  • Match the platform, account currency and broker entity. A familiar account name can cover different schedules.
  • Normalize both opening and closing commissions, including minimums and any documented conversion or rounding.
  • Check typical spreads and wider-spread periods. A single quiet-market quote does not describe execution around news or rollover.
  • Review order execution and your own fill records. A pricing label alone does not establish speed, routing, slippage or the chance of a fill.
  • For positions held overnight, compare the applicable financing terms and other fees alongside spread and commission.

OANDA’s explanation of market conditions describes why spreads can widen when liquidity or volatility changes. MetaTrader 5’s symbol specification provides another place to check contract and commission settings supplied by the broker. For overnight estimates, use the Forex Swap Calculator with the relevant schedule.

A lower modeled transaction cost is one input to the decision. It does not establish that the broker, leverage or product is suitable for you. Account protections and the legal entity’s terms require a separate assessment.

Turn the comparison into a practical account check

  • Record the two account schedules for the same entity, platform and symbol, including their date and the exact commission units.
  • Compare the same position size with a representative spread assumption. Normalize commissions and identify the spread difference needed to offset them.
  • Check a wider-spread scenario and any minimum fee. Keep the trade size tied to your risk plan rather than increasing it to make a fee look smaller.
  • After real trades, reconcile costs with fill prices and the statement. Treat an estimate and an observed execution record as different kinds of evidence.

The Forex Spread Calculator is the next step for a detailed calculation. Enter conditions for your instrument and use the appropriate currency and commission basis; the fixed $10-per-pip value in this guide must not be copied to every market. The Position Size Calculator addresses a different question: how a stop distance and a money-risk budget translate into size.

Keep the comparison dated. Spreads, fee schedules and the account offered to a particular client can change. Recheck the underlying conditions instead of treating “Raw is cheaper” or “Standard is simpler” as a permanent ranking.

Raw Spread vs Standard: common questions

Is a Raw Spread account always cheaper?

No. Its spread saving must exceed the extra commission for the same completed trade. In the example, Raw costs $9 while Standard costs $12 at 1.2 pips, but Standard costs only $8 at 0.8 pip. Different fee rules can change the result.

Does zero commission mean there are no trading costs?

No. A spread can still create a cost, and overnight financing or other applicable charges may remain. Conversely, a zero quoted spread does not remove a separate commission. Check the full schedule for the instrument and account.

Is Raw better for scalping?

Frequent small price targets make transaction costs relevant, but frequency alone does not prove Raw is cheaper. Compare spread plus commission, order execution and the strategy’s actual fills. More trades multiply a cost advantage or disadvantage under unchanged proportional rates.

Does Raw mean ECN execution or less slippage?

The account name is not enough to establish either. Check the broker’s execution terms and relevant evidence. Raw describes a pricing proposition; it does not guarantee a particular route, available liquidity or fill price.

Can I use the $10 pip value for gold or every currency pair?

No. Here it comes from a 100,000-EUR EUR/USD lot, a 0.0001 pip and a USD account. Other contract sizes, pip definitions, quote currencies and account currencies require the appropriate specification and conversion.

Should I deduct the spread again from my trading statement?

Not when P&L is already calculated from actual fill prices: their spread effect is already present. Check how the report handles commissions, swap and other charges, then reconcile only the amounts not already included. Do not assume that a column labelled profit is always before or after every fee.

Sources & further reading

All guides
Forex Spread CalculatorEstimate spread and commission costs with the inputs for your instrument and account.Slippage explainedUnderstand the difference between a reference price and an actual execution.Forex Swap CalculatorEstimate the financing effect of holding a position overnight.Position Size CalculatorRelate your chosen money-risk budget and stop distance to position size.
All guides